Comprehensive Scam/Risk Assessment of LiquidBrokers.com 

⚠️ Immediate Risk Summary:
LiquidBrokers.com presents itself as a forex/CFD broker offering trading in currencies, commodities, stocks, and crypto with features like high leverage, various account types, and advanced trading platforms. However, independent safety tools, user reviews, and risk analyses show serious credibility and transparency issues. Multiple red flags indicate that this platform is high-risk, poorly verified, and potentially unsuitable for most investors without deeper regulatory clarity.

RECOVER YOUR LOST CRYPTO HERE 

1. Regulation and Licensing Claims — Unclear and Highly Questionable

LiquidBrokers.com claims on its website to be linked with “Liquid Markets Pty Ltd,” operating in Australia as an authorised representative under Pulse Markets Pty Ltd, AFSL 220383. The footer risk disclosure states:

The company is a Corporate Authorised Representative (CAR) of Pulse Markets, which holds an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL 220383). (liquidbrokers.com)

However, this claim is highly contentious:

• Independent broker risk reviewers have pointed out that there is regulatory uncertainty, limited transparency, and lack of clear licence verification in official regulator databases. (BrokerHiveX)
• Pulse Markets’ licence may allow certain wholesale services, not full retail CFD/forex services — and the website does not provide a direct, verifiable link to confirm this AFSL relationship. (BrokerHiveX)
• LiquidBrokers restricts client locations from Australia and the United States, despite references to Australian regulation — a contradictory setup that undermines confidence in legal compliance. (Vocal)

Independent verification on ASIC’s official register is necessary before assuming regulatory protection exists.

2. Independent Safety and Trust Scores Are Very Low

Reputation and risk-scanning tools paint a worrying picture about LiquidBrokers.com:

• ScamAdviser assigns the site a very low trust score (0) and flags it as potentially unsafe, citing hidden WHOIS ownership and shared server hosting with other high-risk sites. (ScamAdviser)
• Scamminder gives the platform a 10/100 scam risk score — pointing to generic financial-marketing language, high leverage ads, and overpromising content often seen in dubious platforms. (ScamMinder)
• While a different tool (Scam Detector) gave a middling score (~67.5/100), it still flagged proximity to suspicious websites and advised vigilance. (Scam Detector)

These scores collectively suggest low credibility and elevated risk, especially given the lack of clear regulatory disclosure.

3. Mixed and Concerning User Experiences

User reviews on Trustpilot — which reflect unverified experiences — show highly mixed outcomes:

Negative Reports Include:

• Accounts being blocked without clear reasons. (Trustpilot)
• Hidden charges and poor transparency on funding amounts versus actual received funds upon withdrawal. (Trustpilot)
• Complaints about unclear pricing and possible service issues. (Trustpilot)

Positive Reports Include:

• Some users report fast deposits and withdrawals, and responsive customer service. (Trustpilot)
• A few traders say they’ve traded for extended periods with no major issues. (Trustpilot)

This inconsistency — without verifiable regulated protections — makes the platform’s reliability difficult to judge. Given that Trustpilot reviews are unverified and can be manipulated or biased, these testimonials do not confirm safety. (Trustpilot)

RECOVER YOUR LOST CRYPTO HERE 

4. Transparency About Company and Regulation Is Limited

LiquidBrokers’ website attempts to assure visitors with statements about “segregated accounts” and regulatory compliance, but:

• There is limited independently accessible information on the management team, corporate registration, and detailed licence verification. (BrokerHiveX)
• Claims of rigorous KYC and anti-money-laundering security lack independent confirmation from regulators. (liquidbrokers.com)
• The documented restricted territories list seems inconsistent with claimed regulation and marketing directions. (Vocal)

Legitimate brokers publish clear links to regulator registers and detailed licensing terms that can be independently confirmed. LiquidBrokers.com does not clearly provide this.

5. Pattern of Key Risk Factors Common to Unregulated Brokers

Independent analysts and risk tools highlight several recurring concerns:

a. Website Characteristics:

• Hidden WHOIS domain ownership — a sign often seen with high-risk financial platforms. (ScamAdviser)
• Hosting on a shared server with other questionable domains, increasing cyber risk. (ScamAdviser)

b. Generic and Overpromising Content:

• Marketing uses broad, subjective language like “empower your trading” and “innovative experience,” which can be typical of less transparent platforms. (ScamMinder)

c. High Leverage (Up to 1:500):

• High leverage amplifies risk for retail traders and is often offered by unregulated or lightly regulated brokers without adequate risk controls. (ScamMinder)

These patterns are cited in numerous scam detection recommendations as pre-deposit red flags. (ScamMinder)

6. Withdrawal & Fund Safety Concerns from User Reports

Although some Trustpilot reviewers report smooth payouts, others describe issues such as account blocking and unclear payment discrepancies — classic signs seen in high-risk broker contexts:

• Hidden or unexplained commission deductions. (Trustpilot)
• Accounts being frozen without clear justification. (Trustpilot)

Unregulated or poorly regulated brokers often introduce withdrawal barriers or opaque fee structures that can trap funds. (ScamMinder)

RECOVER YOUR LOST CRYPTO HERE 

7. Contradictory Restricted Territories and Marketing

LiquidBrokers.com lists a long list of restricted countries — including Australia and the USA — even while promoting Australian regulatory ties:

• This contradiction raises questions about legitimacy and who the broker truly serves. (Vocal)
• Significant website traffic reportedly originates from restricted regions, suggesting possible non-compliance with local laws. (Vocal)

In regulated markets, brokers must comply with strict geographic client eligibility rules and cannot just restrict access while soliciting business. (Vocal)

8. Domain History Offers Limited Assurance

The domain has been registered since 2016, which could be positive. (ScamAdviser)
However:

• Age alone does not guarantee legitimacy. Many scam platforms buy older domains to mask risk. (ScamAdviser)

Combined with hidden ownership and risk referrals from safety tools, the domain age doesn’t offer strong confidence. (ScamAdviser)

9. Comparison With Common Scam Indicators

Here’s how LiquidBrokers.com measures against known scam signals:

When several of these indicators are present and not offset by strong regulation, risk increases significantly.

RECOVER YOUR LOST CRYPTO HERE 

10. Final Assessment — High Risk & Due Diligence Needed

Bottom Line: LiquidBrokers.com cannot be confidently classified as a fully legitimate and well-regulated broker. There are multiple red flags — including low independent trust scores, unclear regulatory claims, mixed user feedback, hidden ownership, and marketing contradictions — that strongly suggest high risk and possible non-compliance with recognized financial standards.

Recommendation:
✔ Avoid depositing funds or engaging in trading activities until you can independently verify real regulatory licensing in your jurisdiction.
✔ Confirm licences by checking official regulator databases (e.g., ASIC Connect) rather than relying on the broker’s website claims. (BrokerHiveX)
✔ Seek brokers with clear, transparent regulation and established independent reputations to safeguard your capital.

RECOVER YOUR LOST CRYPTO HERE